Original author: Nermin Hajdarbegovic
Coin News
Original author: Jon Southurst
Original author: Jaroslaw Adamowski
Original author: Stan Higgins
Perkins Coie publishes a legal blog relating to the digital currency space – the Virtual Currency ReportFor this work, the firm takes a small stake in these early-stage ventures. “I would say we’re an investor and that’s part of the reason why we look for equity in the companies,” said Ness.
So, instead of asking for fees, which new startups may not be able afford, Perkins Coie takes a piece of the pie in the hopes the fledgling company will succeed – a similar strategy to that taken by VC investors.
Additionally, because there are so few successful exits in the bitcoin space, Perkins Coie has adopted a policy of going for startups in volume.
“That’s the game in Silicon Valley, it’s a numbers game. You ultimately have to bring in lots and lots of clients to make the numbers work,” Ness explained.
Finding bitcoin startups
Perkins Coie spends a lot of time at events in search of bitcoin startups to represent. The law firm even sponsored the Bitcoin Fair in San Francisco a few months back, and hosted the Stanford Bitcoin Meetup recently.
“We go to a lot of conferences,” Ness said. “It’s amazing how difficult it is to attend all of the conferences. Some of them are happening on the same day.”
Jacob Farber, senior counsel at Perkins Coie, often represents the firm at conferences, speaking on panels regarding bitcoin regulation. He has also provided his time to the Plug and Play incubator as an expert mentor for bitcoin-related startups.
Startup accelerators are another way that Perkins Coie finds new clients, often helping with the legal work involved in setting up an investment fund for early backing.
Ness says that the growth in accelerators accepting bitcoin companies is a positive sign:
“It’s good. It’s healthy. This is what happens every time when something gets hot. I think it was big data just before bitcoin.”
When Perkins Coie and venture capitalists are looking at startups, talent trumps the idea, every time, he indicates. A solid team of founders is what investors are looking for, and so those are the businesses the law firm wants to represent.
“If you can find guys that are really smart, whether the idea has merit or not, those are the guys likely to figure it out,” explained Ness.
Heavy investment
The pace of venture investment in bitcoin-related companies has risen by an impressive amount in 2014 – up 30% over last year at this point.
Source: CoinDeskThere is a network effect involved here: investors not yet on the bitcoin bandwagon see companies receive funding and experience success, which draws more investment money into the space.
“I think it’s going to be healthy for the whole bitcoin community to start to see some of these guys that are really going to be successful. We’re starting to see a lot of top-shelf VCs getting interested,” said Ness.
Venture capitalist Tim Draper’s recent investment in the entire lot of seized Silk Road bitcoin auctioned off by the US government has also brought bitcoin into the limelight.
Investment in bitcoin financial services startups. Source: Venture ScannerAnd funding rounds for companies such as BlockScore and BitFury of late show that investors are willing to make bets on less conventional cryptocurrency business ideas, such as identity verification and mining.
Banking and regulation
Despite a positive mood in investment circles, Ness believes uncertainty over the regulation of bitcoin companies will continue to bring unpredictability to the industry:
“Even with a lot of deal flow around bitcoin companies, I think that regulatory uncertainty is the thing that is going to be most difficult for early companies to deal with.”
In terms of regulatory ambiguity, Ness says that there are divergent issues to be considered legally between, say, a bitcoin accounting startup and bitcoin exchanges. “There’s definitely a difference,” he said. “[Exchanges] really are displacing banks and need to fulfil a role banks play in the money system.”
VC Investment in bitcoin exchange/wallet startups. Source: Venture ScannerThe big problem right now, especially for exchanges (and some wallet providers) that might be considered money transmitters, is there are 50 different US states, which may have different laws and licensing requirements, and there are therefore a multitude of regulatory issues to deal with. And that comes at a cost.
Ness estimates that startups which need to go through getting licensed in each US state would have spend two years and at least $1m to make that a reality.
That’s time and money startups simply do not have. And it’s likely that this issue is conflicting for the banking industry as well. Banks are not yet embracing virtual currency businesses, possibly due to reluctance to work with inexperienced firms, which creates further hurdles for bitcoin startups.
Ness pointed out:
“What it really boils to the fact that bitcoin companies are novices. Banks have all sorts of really stringent requirements. And they just can’t trust a startup company to do things the way they need them to do.”
Even in the face of such challenges, Perkins Coie has been helping bitcoin startups navigate uncharted waters for several years already – a long time in the world of cryptocurrencies.
In the future, the firm sees promise in cryptographic systems that track ownership and proof in distributed form. “The technology is solid, and the opportunity is vast. It’s really a new paradigm for the way to do a lot of different things,” said Ness, adding:
“The promise is really great, down the road.”
Note: Startup investment charts only demonstrate VC funding. Charts do not necessarily reflect companies represented by Perkins Coie.
Justice scale image via Shutterstock
bankinginvestmentlawlegalPerkins CoieStartups
Original author: Daniel Cawrey
Original author: Stan Higgins
“Young Ukrainians are used to buying goods from [online] shops abroad, for example, in China. If someone needs to pay $100 for a buggy for his child, he needs to pay about $40 for SWIFT payments and spend half the day at the bank. We’ve opened a window to the world to help people survive,” he said.
Stanislav would not give details on BTCU’s transaction data from from the BNK-24 terminals. He did confirm, though, that BTCU’s rates – which are about 3.5% – are at a slight premium to those asked by Bitstamp. He said that a popular reddit post that described using a terminal to buy bitcoin, and claiming that there was a markup of 10-15%, for the service, was inaccurate.
Murky legal status
The Ukrainian government issued legal guidance for bitcoin businesses in February, stating that firms have to register with the government in order to operate.
Nevertheless, companies in the bitcoin space say the guidelines are not definitive, and continue to operate with a degree of vagueness. The National Credit Bank’s Dumchev, for example, said:
“The process is quite grey according to Ukrainian legislation.”
Stanislav echoed a similar sentiment, saying that there is no law in Ukraine explicitly prohibiting the use of bitcoin and that the Ukrainian government’s actions spurred him to promote the use of bitcoin as a “tool for common people”, in the face of government control.
“For us, bitcoin is more than a way of transferring money. It is an ideology of free people. [A government's] attitude to bitcoin is a litmus test, it shows the true face of the government. That’s why we support bitcoin,” he said.
Kiev image via Shutterstock. Terminal image courtesy of Roman Skaskiw.
BTCUNational Credit Bankpaymentsukrainevouchers
Original author: Joon Ian Wong
Original author: Jon Southurst