A Look at the Executive Order on Cryptos and What It Means


This article from Nasdaq is a review of the status of the executive order (EO) on cryptos, which was issued back in March. We com...

This article from Nasdaq is a review of the status of the executive order (EO) on cryptos, which was issued back in March.  We commented on several of these papers a couple of months back.

 To date, the departments of Treasury, Commerce and Justice, as well as the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, have published responses to the executive order. The various reports by different agencies pursue certain directions in line with requirements from the executive order and their respective purviews. The author explains, for example, that the Justice Department pursued crypto crimes while the Commerce Department recommended more engagement with both private companies and international regulators “to promote development of digital asset policies … consistent with U.

S. values and standards. ” The Treasury issued several reports as well, including an overall framework and also had a public commentary period.

 The EO contributing author also indicates that ‘responsible development’ was a key guideline, meaning that financial inclusion and overall consumer benefit must be a goal. Leaving aside the political aspects of the EO, the article states that the reports tried to holistically assess what the ‘future of money’ looks like.  The EO co-author also points out that the EO was written a while ago and that a lot of things have happened in the crypto world subsequently to reinforce many of the points around transparency and better communication about the industry, along with effective regulation.

The whole question about the legality of the Fed issuing a digital currency is also an open question. In any event, readers who have interest can read through the piece and pick up what they need, and it includes several links to released reports as well.   he bottom line is that the U.

S. is moving relatively slowly compared to other central banks across the globe, which certainly is reflective of the existing USD dominance in trade markets, which in turn reduces urgency to ‘not fall behind’ since the consequences of such are not actually known. Overview by Steve Murphy, Director, Commercial and Enterprise Payments Advisory Service at Mercator Advisory Group.



By Steve Murphy
Dec 08, 2022 00:00
Original link