Bad Credit Card News at the WSJ?


When I read the Wall Street Journal headline “Visa, Mastercard Prepare to Raise Credit-Card Fees,” the first thing that went through my mind was that it didn't make sense

When I read the Wall Street Journal headline “Visa, Mastercard Prepare to Raise Credit-Card Fees,” the first thing that went through my mind was that it didn’t make sense. Mastercard and Visa have not signaled an upcoming rate change.

We never would have missed that. It is hard to miss Mastercard or Visa in the news, with constant developments in inclusion, product design, and security. The article cites a chart from the Nilson Report and talks about revenue generated by interchange, with a 10-year history. The chart illustrates rapid interchange growth, but it lacks important data.  For instance, if you look at Mastercard’s supplementary disclosures for gross dollar volume, you will see that Q2 2021 volumes were $619 billion in the United States and grew to $717 billion in Q3 2023, a nearly 16% increase during the comparative period.  Lay those numbers against the WSJ interchange increases, and the movement is linear and makes sense.

References were made to a small research firm servicing the merchant side of payments, but there was no bank-side analyst representation or even a payment brand comment. Well, they read the WSJ up in Purchase, N.Y., and Mastercard responded with this release. The first paragraph sums it up: “Unfortunately, this story is wrong.”  In four points, Mastercard refutes the WSJ article: Mastercard is not raising U.S. interchange rates this fall and has no plans to do so. Mastercard is not raising U.S.

network fees required for the processing of Mastercard transactions this fall. The Authorization Optimizer service is the only Mastercard fee noted in the study cited by the Journal. It is not related to interchange. This service is designed to reduce the likelihood that subscription and recurring payments will be declined, with any related fees being de minimis in scope. The article notes that Congress is considering legislation that could lower costs for merchants, yet it fails to mention the negative consequences for consumers: compromised security, a loss of rewards programs, and higher prices on goods and services. For example, after similar legislation pertaining to debit transactions was passed in 2010, the Federal Reserve of Richmond concluded that consumer prices increased. The WSJ usually provides excellent insights on credit cards, but this time perhaps the editor was on PTO.  The article lacks the balance you get used to in the WSJ.  Overview by Brian Riley, Director of Credit /Co-Head of Payments at Javelin Strategy & Research.

By Brian Riley
Sep 06, 2023 00:00
Original link